An official programme of the Government of the Republic of Vanuatu — Council of Ministers Decision N°273 Legal framework Contact EN
Status: No applications yet — register interest.

The National Development Fund & the SBD route

How an applicant’s capital — invested or contributed — becomes national development: independently governed, regulated and audited, without adding guaranteed debt and without touching the Reserve Bank.

Fees pay for the programme; this page explains the larger sum each National Status applicant commits to Vanuatu, the two routes by which they can commit it, and the governance that keeps it clean. On either route, a national contribution goes straight to the Treasury.

Government development fund pipeline visual showing audited records, Vanuatu harbour and public infrastructure
Development capital, under public controlRing-fenced investment channels, independent audit and traceable national-development deployment.
Route A · invest

The National Development Fund

VT 5,000,000+ VT 1,000,000 national contribution to the Treasury · indicative, set by regulation
  • An at-risk investment into an independent, regulated Fund — pooled and put to work for the nation
  • Deployed into government bonds and approved strategic projects: infrastructure, urban renewal, disaster recovery and resilience
  • Redeemed after a fixed lock-up period — the value may rise or fall; it is not capital-protected
  • Managed under a fixed mandate by an independent investment committee

At-risk means exactly that: the investor shares the risk of the portfolio. The State does not guarantee repayment — which is precisely why the Fund adds no fixed debt to the national budget.

Route B · contribute

Strategic Business Development (SBD)

VT 3,000,000+ VT 1,000,000 national contribution to the Treasury · indicative, set by regulation
  • A non-returning contribution paid directly to local priority enterprises
  • Recipients approved by the same independent investment committee, on published criteria
  • Directed to where the country most needs growth — agriculture, fisheries, tourism, manufacturing and services
  • Externally audited, with public disclosure

Nothing is returned to the applicant: the SBD is a contribution to the local economy, not an investment — and it earns no rights beyond eligibility for status.

Applicant one route, A or B Route A · VT 5m Development Fund · at-risk Route B · VT 3m SBD · non-returning Bonds + projects Local enterprises VT 1m · both routes national contribution Treasury
Where an applicant’s money goes — both routes, and what reaches the TreasuryIndicative amounts — set by regulation under the Act
The point to hold onto

An investment — not government debt

The Fund replaces the old idea of a refundable government bond. Because the investment is at-risk rather than guaranteed:

  • No fixed debt is added to the budget. There is no dated, guaranteed repayment the country must find in seven years; the investor shares the risk of the projects.
  • The Reserve Bank is not burdened. The Fund is a ring-fenced vehicle issued by a regulated local financial institution — it does not run through the central bank or touch monetary policy.
  • It brings patient capital, not hot money. Capital is committed to national development for the medium term — not free to flee at the first tremor in tourism.

To the extent the Fund lends to the Government by buying bonds, that portion is ordinary, transparent borrowing on favourable terms — tracked by the Ministry of Finance like any other.

Who manages the money

Three roles, deliberately separated

The money is kept out of any single pair of hands. The politicians of the day do not control the Fund, and the institution that holds it does not, by itself, decide where it is invested.

RoleWhoWhat they do
Investment decisionsAn independent investment management committeeDecides how the Fund invests, under a fixed mandate — and approves SBD recipient enterprises on published criteria
Issue & safekeepingA regulated local development financing institutionIssues and holds the Fund; provides custody and financial credibility
OversightThe financial-services regulator (VFSC) + an external auditorSupervises, audits, and requires public disclosure
The arrangement is laid before Parliament so Members can see it. Status is decoupled from the money on either route: investment performance never affects a person’s status, and no contribution earns extra rights.

The hard questions, answered

Is this government debt by another name?

No. It is an at-risk investment fund, not a guaranteed bond. The State does not promise to repay each investor, so no fixed liability is added to the budget. Where the Fund buys government bonds, that portion is ordinary, transparent borrowing tracked by the Ministry of Finance.

Could the money be captured by a few people?

The structure is built to prevent exactly that: an independent committee decides investments, a regulated institution holds the money, and the regulator and an external auditor watch both — with annual disclosure. No minister and no single official controls the Fund.

If the Fund loses money, does the taxpayer pay?

No. Investors bear the investment risk — that is the disclosed nature of an at-risk fund. The taxpayer is not the backstop; that is precisely why this structure is safer for Vanuatu than a guaranteed bond.

Does the Reserve Bank carry the risk?

No. The Fund is a separate, ring-fenced vehicle issued by a regulated local financial institution. It does not run through the central bank, does not touch monetary policy, and does not put the Reserve Bank’s balance sheet at risk.

The bottom line on the Fund

Foreign capital becomes Vanuatu’s own infrastructure and resilience — independently managed, regulated and audited — without guaranteed debt, without burdening the Reserve Bank, and without ever linking a person’s status to their money.